Being a sports fan is a constant challenge and a relationship that can
be a love affair or drive someone crazy. If you are a Met fan this
dichotomy is always in play. Let's be clear about the New York Mets,
they are clearly a very poorly run franchise, they are a big market team
that never seems willing to dig into their pockets to provide talent on
the field or for the fans. The front office doesn't seem to have a plan
in place or a direction that is consistent for winning over time. They
ask their fans to be loyal which they are even when the results on the
field are never positive for very long. Met fans are constantly waiting
for their next minor leaguer to be a star or the next win streak however
short it may be. Last year their season revolved around RA Dicky, this
year this season so far has revolved around Matt Harvey and the sweep
of the Yankees. It was a wonderful weekend for the Mets as they
established themselves as a real team at least for 4 days against the
Yankees. Then, unfortunately, they went to Miami and got swept by
the worst team in baseball, once again reminding Met fans of the reality
of their team. For the Mets 50+ years of existence and the overall winning %
is .478. and therein lies the rub. Met fans level of expectation is
never high enough or demanding enough. Unfortunately over the years
their season revolves around a couple of good players, one good week,
one big series win over the season and that seems to be enough to
placate the owners and many of their fans. It's not that their fans
don't want more they just don't expect it because of the history of the
team and it's front office. The bar is raised too low and the Mets are given
a pass by the media, the newspapers and everyone else who does not
demand this large market franchise with deep pockets provide a better
product for the fans. If this was the Red Sox or the Yankees or the
Dodgers or even the Cubs there would be revolution in the streets, but
the local media and other major outlets never criticize the Mets for
there ineptness. What other franchise with their own cable network would
have the nerve to provide as bad a product as the Mets do on a nightly
basis? Met fans, and God bless them, are always sold the idea that next
year will be better and it never is. After coming off a terrible year in
2012 the Mets off season plans and subsequent talent acquisition
amounted to nothing. But that's okay because they don't have to answer
questions to the general public about their unwillingness to try and
improve the team. Maybe the owners really do care, but if you continue
to show a total lack of effort to improve your product you either don't
care or you're clueless about how to do it, either way you are selling a
flea circus to the public and asking them to care.
Mets fans deserve
better.
Wednesday, June 5, 2013
Sunday, June 2, 2013
The Need For Change
As a life long Ranger fan it was very difficult to watch the slow death
the Rangers experienced at the hands of the Boston Bruins. There are
many questions surrounding the Rangers moving forward. Maybe they just
weren't good enough to advance past the Bruins or maybe their mistakes
finally caught up to them against a better team then Washington. Staal
and Clowe being out certainty didn't help. And of course their power
play speaks for itself. Obviously these are some of the issues that jump
out at you, but I think the problems go deeper. I think the issues with
this team are also systematic and have to fall on the doorstep of the
head coach John Tortorella. He is a taxing coach to play for and his
system leaves virtually no room for error. His defense minded strategies
leave his goalie alone and a target for teams to virtually tee off on
while his other players try to block shots and defend the shooting
lanes. This might be viable at the end of the game while trying to
protect a lead but as a game in game out strategy it puts tremendous
pressure on the goalie and exhausts the defense. It can win games but
never allows your team to get a big lead and close out games early by
scoring multiple goals. His team's margin for error is virtually
non-existent. Maybe that's the reason John Tortorella has never won a
playoff series in less than seven games. Good teams have the ability to
step up the level of play and distance themselves during the course of
the game so that they have some breathing room , and can make a mistake
without it costing them the game. Tortorella's conservative
restrictive game also limits his more creative players, Gabrek,
Richards, Nash, etc. The Rangers pay huge money for these players and
then they are forced to fit into a system that limits their creativity
and therefore their ability to score. Once again systematic limitations.
Their power play is also systematically inept , they try to shoot from
the point, other teams get better angles and more open ice moving side
to side and not front to back. Teams know how to defend the Rangers
because their power play is unimaginative. How can a coach go this far
into a season and fail at this aspect of the game and not make
adjustments. That is one of John Tortorella's problems, he is also
arrogant stubborn and spiteful... His teams play hard for him but I'm
not sure whether it's out of respect or fear. I find it interesting that
John Tortorella has problems coaching the biggest stars on the team,
maybe it's not their problem maybe it's his, or more to the point his
system. Great coaches succeed overtime because of their ability to
adjust to game situations and change their philosophies based on their
talent and depth. Tortorella has left a path of destruction in his wake.
He has a resume, Conference Finals last year Final 8 this year, a past
Stanley Cup championship in Tampa. But it's always with a price. In
addition, he is poisonous to the media as well, why? The biggest problem
now is the best player on the team King Henrik doesn't seem to want to
play for him or the Ranger's anymore, maybe it's because they are too
systematically challenged !!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)